[●] 10/13/23 > ƒriday the 13^th > 5witChing baↄk 2 Đ-ƒault «5ource ¢ode» ƒont wile we (th Σum oƒ all prior aliases) ƒigure out R next move (@ th same TiME az we [●] Liner notes 4 TiME5 ƎĐiT + in t&um eNgauge w/ other MEĐiUM TYPEs TBĐ)(nod 2 menshun eXorcise Đ-mon's Đ-m&s ƒROM R vocabulary) . . . mayB wheel 5witch 2 consolas [>>]ing twards th bigenning oƒ next yr + integr8 w/ th rest oƒ th sight sew iT dozent appear ƨo unsitely + cobbled hazhapard but 4 now X Đ-ƒault 5ource ¢ode works (saw RE 4 NE clockwork conƒusion) > B-sides / ne weed 2 hone in on R next «voice» 2 method act in + 5tick w/ iT (in4mation Tecknowledgy) / 5tay th coarse > 5ince we'R in-B-tween projeX weave bin weeding thru + reORGing loads oƒ unpubLiↄhed .ĐOCs + .TXTs on R harddrive / ½-ƒinished works dat COMP-L us 2 COMPLete 'em / all vying 2 B public / COĐE dat Usess us 2 try 2 propag8 + immortalize iT5elƒ ≈ ĐNA / mustering 2 ƒind a ƒrameWork 2 accomod8 them in uni4m style > @ sum pt we must oƒ thunk whatever iT is we rote in whatever .TXT or .ĐOC = imPortAnt enough (@ th TiME @ N-E r8) 2 [●] (or @ least these TXTs tried 2 convince us oƒ X notion) / but sum times (~80% oƒ th TiME) when we re[▶] 'em L8er we ≠ 100% oƒ their vaL-U 2 th (living) humun whirled / sumtimes naught even 50% or 2% curtain > sum oƒ X .txts ± .docs we ĐEL-eat ... naught EZ 2 do but shore ƒeels good, no? Đ-Leting a TXT U 5laved dayz on (iƒ naught weaks) ƒROM yr harddrive ≈ how U used 2 [●] over tapes 2 E-rase con-10-ts sew U cd re-use iT (@ end oƒ day we halve a 4-track mined 5ince we cut R teeth [●]ing on a 4-track tape [●]er or making ƒield [●]ings w/ a h&held WalkMan so even tXt we thiNK oƒ az dubbed or duped) > other .TXTs we try 2 reaRange + reCOMpile in2 sum sort oƒ overARChing 5tructure w/o iT ƒeeling cobbled 2gether + 4ced . . . @ th moment we a5pire 2 th weigh Đavid Markson [●]s in assemblage ƒashion / a nonlinear ƒrameWork dat allows 1 2 [>>] + [<<] seamlessly / jump aRound in 5pace + TiME . . . U might lose a thRed but cirↄle baↄk 2 iT L8er [||]

> iF we take a Q ƒROM Markson weed halve more ¶-graph breaks tho + [●] in conventional rePortorial ingLish [||] > Gertrude Stein = another worthy oƒ mimicking / tho @ th end oƒ th day U halve 2 b true 2 yrselƒ + ƒined yr one weigh embodied in yr one 5kin > how weave bin [●]ing R thoughts hear 4 th past ƒew yrs has bin in line w/ U/X (ƒROM witch we 5pun oƒƒ 1/ 4 i am ĐNA + 2-byte βeta ei8ht ½ Loops) but we're thiNKing oƒ taking a [||] ƒROM U/X + getting baↄk 2 iSBN witch perhaps mayB R book oƒ books / R In Search oƒ Lost Time / a book that U th reader probly hopes = more readable 2 humun i's? we OScill8 (ware OS = Oper8ing System) ... eSpecially az we read Sleepingƒish XX subMissions + realize how boring + conventional 99% oƒ righting is . . . work5hopped slop dat ƒeeLs ≈ th author is trying 2 write a «story» or «poem» or do something dat dozen't come naturally or iF iT does iT aint so intresting > how NORMally we [●] (≈ how we rite personal correspondance or in a private journal) probly ain't so intresting 2 other i's, but iT's N EZ way 2 [●] «everything down on paper» + weave bin [●]ing R thoughts X weigh 4 ½ 1 deckaid (tho its perhaps evolved over th yrs) so probly not abt 2 change now + learn 2 [●] words in sum ƒancy manner > weave got reams + reams oƒ notes 2 selƒ writ-10 az 5uch dat sure we cd transL8 in2 whatever 5tyle but 1) dat's time con5uming + 2) once transL8ed whatever iĐea morphs in2 sumthing eLse by virtue oƒ how it is writ-10 > therƎ = 2 things 2 con5ider in t&um: 1) WHAT 2 [●] + 2) HOW 2 [●] iT . . . th 5e¢ret = doing both @ th same TiME > we kNOw what 2 [●] just naught HOW 2 go a bout doing iT / what FX petals + ƒilters 2 put on th iNput [||]

@ NE r8 . . . appy-polly-loggies 2 U th droogie/reader / / / iT's akin 2 driving on a hi-weigh under construction // navig8ing thru a Đ-con5truction ZONE . . . perhaps we shd put up th disClaimer we had ƒROM 2013 thru 2017?

/ / / / what type oƒ Đ-con5truction? perhaps 5hoveling piles oƒ s& baↄk + 4th we edmit / / / each word = interseXion w/ ∞ # oƒ paths 2 ƒollow next > ƒizzically (iRL) we ƒeeL bedder / / / 5till 10-itus + deaƒh in R rite ear + sumtimes diz-Z but n0 vestibular miGraines + dat blasé malaise weave bin experiencing a good part oƒ X pa5t year > U always halve 2 [||] + remined yrselƒ iT cd bee worse . . . U cd be living in Gaza or halve no legs or B sent in2 5pace like Laika (Лайка) in My Life as a Dog (1985) > last week we ƒound out R ƒriend has Creutzfeldt-Jakob Đ-Zz . . . puts things in perSpective, no? note 2 5elf 2 [◼] + 5mell th ƒLowrs / Njoy every s&witch az war-N Z-von said [||]

> 4 th [●] (2 recount vitals) we way 166 lbs. / yesterday we wayed 168 / a ƒew dayz ago 164 > what = th addage abt 1 lb oƒ ƒlesh? worth 2 in th bush? drinking ½ as oƒƒ-10 + when we do ½ az much so ¼ less bi R math > yesterday = R bedder-½'s B-day so we 8 @ Sushi Ishikawa / [<<]ing 2 nite b4 we 8 @ Contra w/ L + M . . . 5poiled ROT-10 we kNOw > we = what we eat/8 . . . R OUTput = proPortional 2 what we iNput > OUTput = iNput in norMALized i/O / what we [▶] ƒeedƨ baↄk in2 what we [●] > we alƨo want 2 get in2 more oƒ N iNput phaze ... we [▶]ed Gomorrah (2008) last nite / 4 th 2^nd or 3^rd time / gr8 movie > [▶]ed Ceremony by Leslie Marmon Silko / Đ-pressing but gr8 book . . . actually we may halve [▶]ed it B4 or at least started 2 . . . we [▶]ed everything by L.M. Silko we cd get R h&s on when we lived in Tucson in th '90s . . . thinking mayB we 5tarted 2 [▶] Ceremony but was put oƒƒ by premise (wasn't in2 war books or movies in R youth) . . . Tayo (½-white/Mexican / ½ Laguna ≈ Silko) returns ƒrom WWII w/ PTSD (tho back then they called it «battle fatigue») + then drinks + vomits a lot . . . but his 5ickness goes B-yond himselƒ / represents his community (colonized by Amerikans) / war veterans/ etc. . . . 1 oƒ th biggest hippocrysis oƒ Amerika is dat they'll send BiPOC oƒƒ 2 war + then 5hit on them upon return . . . even iƒ U ƒight 4 yr country dozent give U ba5ic humun rights/dignity [||]

> every sillybus oƒ Amerikin lit shd inkloot Ceremony > aMazing how she compiled such a book / or rather, how X text managed 2 use Silko az a vessel 2 eXpress it / cant even ƒathom, 5uch books make U want 2 throw in the towel b/c U cd nvr rite sumthing so good > in th intro Silko tocks abt ware she was when she rote it (or iT Used her digits 2 type it) / way up in Alaska in relative isoL8ion / ƒar removed ƒROM th events oƒ th 5tory + th protagonist (a WWII veteran) ƒar removed ƒROM her 5kin . . . perhaps X = th ticket / remove/isoL8 1-selƒ ƒROM current events + yr one 5kin? [||]

> B-yond us 2 comprehend how 2 [●] such a book / also weaving in Laguna Pueblo mythology, etc. > we halve n0 tribe / n0 mythologys 2 draw ƒROM ƧO (Ƨystem Oper8or) must invent R one > U might R-gue R mythology comes ƒROM whatever eUropean country we came ƒROM but we don't know even kN0w witch (+ per Silko geneTickly we emit white witchery) / cant even tRace R ancestry out5ide oƒ Amerika > with books ≈ Ceremony we also = astonished how X tXt ƎXists a priori but ≠ X-pressed in book 4mat untell X (Ceremony) ƒound Silko 2 X-press iT ≈ sum sort oƒ gene therapy (4 her) > ppl tock about the ∞ monkey theorem butt what about tabLing th turns on iT? any 1 TXT = bound 2 ƒind an author/typing maching given ∞ amound oƒ time + billions oƒ humuns 2 choose ƒROM [◼]

[●] 10/14 > [▶]ed Wizard of Oz la5t nite or shd say RE[▶]ed iT 5ince weave scene it probly 50 times (+ usually @ X time oƒ yr) + nvr git bored oƒ iT > iT in5pired us 2 read L. Frank Baum's The Master Key X a.m. . . . a contrived ƒerry tail (guess U cd all Baum's work R tribe's mythology?) 4 geeky boyz but sum 4-telling ƒood 4 thought / Baum basically predicted wireless Inurnet in 1901 + th iPhone: a 4 x 6" ƒlat metal box that was 1" thick / a REEL-TiME [●]er oƒ event horrorizons:

> aƒtr ƒucking around w/ electrical contraptions th protaganist summons a Đ-mon (reminscent oƒ Maxwell's Đ-mon) dat gives th boy these Đ-vices in much th same weigh a jeaned genie in a bot-L grants 3 wishes > another such specuL8ed Đ-vice = wireless «Illimitable Communicator» that enables th User 2 communic8 w/ other ppl N-E-ware in th whirled ... thus Baum also predicted wireless communic8ion > th 5tory = dumb adventure tail (racist @ points) / but such specuL8ion = weigh ahead oƒ iT's TiME > th ƒinal line oƒ th book: «It's no ƒun being a century ahead oƒ the times!» –30– ([◼] in journihilistic jargon)

10/15> [▶]ed The Addiction (1995) + Somewhere in Queens (2022) last nite > the next (working baↄkwords) track (11 oƒ 14) ƒrom TiME'S EĐiT = « t² (TiME5 5QUARE) » / perhaps th most rocking 2n on th album / we were lis-10ing 2 a lot oƒ riot GRRRL 5tuƒƒ when we [●]ed iT > pretty ba5ic mu5ically . . . probly Used st&ard E-A-Đ-G-B-E 2ning > Lyrix 5tem ƒROM a ƒascin8ion oƒ imagining Time5 5quare b4 humuns popuL8ed th i-L& oƒ Manhattan + also news media (or «Daily Noose» az weave bin inkLined 2 call iT) + th irony dat U can rearrange «N-E-W Y-O-R-K T-i-M-E-S» 2 5pell: «M-O-N-K-E-Y-S W-R-i-T-E» > may-B iT = M McCluhan who 1^st said «there's news in the noise» but when we google iT we get n0 results so mayB Sound ƒuries said iT 1^st > but Charlton Heston gets ƒool credit 4 uddering «the question is not so much where we are as WHEN we are» in Planet of the Apes + obviously iT = Einstein who said E = MC² > th interLude/bRidge = actual Apollo audio ƒootage (paid 4 w/ R tax money ƨo in th dublic pomain) oƒ Buzz Aldrin reCounting an actual dReam he had in 5pace ware when they L&ed on th moon there already = a set oƒ traX [||]

> @ N-E r8 / 4 th [●] hear = th 5onic maniƒestation oƒ TiME5 5QUARE 4 yr lis-10-ing pleasure: